Global warming is escalating even faster than we thought.
The projections of global warming make it clear that it is crucial for countries to commit to
30×30, a plan to protect 30 percent of the world’s ocean and 30 percent of global land and inland waters. Protecting and conserving the oceans and land can help address the rapidly increasing amount of atmospheric carbon, sustain critical biodiversity and strengthen the resilience of communities. Nature-based solutions also present the opportunity for carbon sequestration, allowing for the removal and storage of carbon from the atmosphere. For instance, protecting and restoring blue carbon ecosystems offers a means of carbon sequestration.
What are blue carbon ecosystems?
rich coastal ecosystems, blue carbon ecosystems, such as tidal marshes and mangroves, are useful for storing carbon dioxide and can aid in reducing the effects of climate change. Based on current assessments, the carbon sequestration capacity of these ecosystems appears promising. These natural areas can also provide numerous ecosystem services, such as areas for fish spawning and nursing. Initiatives such as the Blue Carbon Initiative develop projects to conserve and restore existing blue carbon ecosystems.
As one coastal ecosystem that support blue carbon, mangroves forests serve as important carbon sinks, because they have the ability to
store at least three times as much carbon as terrestrial tropical forests. Apart from this, they also offer resilience to climate change impacts because the trees and roots provide shoreline protection from extreme weather and erosion. Sediment trapping in the roots also shields soil from erosion, which is likely due to friction preventing tidal flow. In a study with simulated models of mangroves in Bangladesh, the Keora mangroves, one of the tallest mangrove species in the Sundarbans Reserve Forest, drastically reduced local seawater rise, with estimates ranging from 1.6 to 6.5 inches.
Rich coastal ecosystems are important carbon sinks and must be embraced by global climate action.
In Latin America, blue carbon programs are still an emerging solution to carbon dioxide removal. Despite their benefits, mangroves are often not sufficiently protected and are destroyed. Recently, Mexican state-owned oil company
Pemex cut down protected mangrove forests for the construction of the Dos Bocas Oil Refinery. Despite a pre-existing commitment to protect environmental goods from Mexico’s Agency for Safety, Energy, and Environment (Spanish), and the possibility of gaining $1.19 billion from restoring mangroves, mangrove protection has not been appropriately prioritized. In Brazil, mangroves aren’t being protected either. In a controversial decision by the current Brazilian administration, mangrove and coastal ecosystem protections have been revoked, leading to pollutant retention and increased environmental vulnerabilities. So why aren’t these tropical ecosystems actively supported despite the many benefits?
In general, one reason there aren’t more blue carbon initiatives implemented globally is because there is
not enough research to understand the advantages of blue carbon. Analyzing blue carbon ecosystem management can create new opportunities for carbon dioxide removal and sustainable ocean development. Besides that, industrial development is frequently prioritized over marine ecosystem conservation. Planning blue carbon projects thoroughly and efficiently is critical. These projects need to consider changing climate conditions, to prepare for future potentialities such as increased salinity in the water. Developing models and investigating how variability and carbon chemistry affect environmental tolerance can also unearth the key to successful blue carbon ecosystems. A blue future
Advancing nature-based solutions — such as protecting and restoring blue carbon ecosystems in Latin America and beyond — must be an integral part of global climate action. Investing in research will create opportunities to expand blue carbon management and protection by offering guidance and techniques for project success. By supporting research efforts, countries can identify the tools necessary to protect, restore and conserve nature for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Beyond advancing blue carbon research proficiency, countries should include nature-based solutions in their
Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). Financing and developing nature-based solutions to adapt to climate hazards can be extremely beneficial for humans and the environment. Community-led nature-based solutions can tackle biodiversity loss and promote sustainable development for local groups.
Although the recent IPCC report stressed a
code red for the climate crisis, there is still a potential for decelerating global warming and reducing the impacts of climate hazards. At COP26, government leaders must commit to rapidly reducing greenhouse gas emissions from energy generation, transportation and deforestation. It’s also imperative that they commit to advancing nature-based solutions to ensure a sustainable future that averts climate catastrophes.